| longer or shorter algorithms? | |
|
Goto page : 1, 2  |
| Author | Message |
|---|
nEwo 3x3x3


   Age : 19 Joined : 01 Dec 2007 Posts : 177 Location : Imus, cavite
| Subject: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 1:49 pm | |
| what do you prefer longer but easier to execute alg or shorter but kinda hard to execute? during my memorization days of oll, i found out two oll algs from noort's page which has more or less 13 moves which is exactly two olls: sune + FRUR'U'F' and antisune + FRUR'U'F'
master ken told me this: longer + finger tricks = faster(lol)
wana know other cuber's opinion too. . ! ! _________________ 2x2 Single PB: 11.xx 2x2 Average PB: 17.xx 3x3 Single PB: 18.83 3x3 Average PB: 25.63 3x3 Siamese PB: 47.xx
"It would take sometime to be a cuber, but it take seconds to be a speedcuber. . . "

friendster and YM:
owen_maza3420@yahoo.com.ph |
|
 | |
Syalang 4x4x4


   Age : 16 Joined : 06 Apr 2008 Posts : 471
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 2:30 pm | |
| hmm.. its good to have longer but easier fingerstricks...
for me.. |
|
 | |
TheJoker 5x5x5


  Age : 37 Joined : 02 Feb 2008 Posts : 589
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 2:44 pm | |
| marami nagsabi... it doesn't matter how hard the ALGS is... or how long it is...
it is your finger tricks... just like this...
Z Perm... * (x') R U' R' U D R' D U' R' U R D2' F (x)
he does it like just 1 seconds...
nalimutan ko yun sites... puro finger tricks yun... from R U to R U R' U' etc...
and i saw also in a video... he's still using the original FRIDRICH... hindi optimized or enhanced or alternatives... pero sub18...
pero siyempre... bibilis ka lalo kung optimized... easy kahit long algs... shorter the better... and FAST FINGER TRICKS...
well yun ang hinuha ko... kaya sub35 pa rin me for 3 weeks...
heheheheheheh...      _________________ My Official TIME: Philippine Open 2008 2x2 = 13.30 [46] 3x3 = 27.40 [96] 3x3 OH = 61.14 [44] 3x3 BLD = 9:06.97 [20] 4x4 = 2:17.59 [26] 5x5 = 5:18.61 [18] Megaminx = 7:00.25 [23] Pyraminx = 29.97 [16] |
|
 | |
nEwo 3x3x3


   Age : 19 Joined : 01 Dec 2007 Posts : 177 Location : Imus, cavite
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 2:48 pm | |
| after memorizing my OLLs nbreak ko n ung stable sub35 ko into unstable sub30s... meju ntuwa ako pewu marame p dn akong ka2ining NFA rice pra mging sub20..! _________________ 2x2 Single PB: 11.xx 2x2 Average PB: 17.xx 3x3 Single PB: 18.83 3x3 Average PB: 25.63 3x3 Siamese PB: 47.xx
"It would take sometime to be a cuber, but it take seconds to be a speedcuber. . . "

friendster and YM:
owen_maza3420@yahoo.com.ph |
|
 | |
jr_orata 3x3x3


   Age : 16 Joined : 19 Oct 2007 Posts : 71 Location : Nueva Ecija
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 8:31 pm | |
| | for me, use the shorther one, kasi po, medyo mabagal nga kaysa sa long but with nice fingertricks. PERO, pag namaster mo na, mas mabilis un kaysa sa longer lalo na pag namaster mo na ung fingertricks |
|
 | |
whitecube 3x3x3


  Age : 13 Joined : 05 May 2008 Posts : 136 Location : Pasig
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Wed May 07, 2008 9:34 pm | |
| shorter, kasi mas malupet pag katapos mo eh _________________
click me |
|
 | |
pepesmith 4x4x4


   Age : 15 Joined : 05 Sep 2007 Posts : 369
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 3:21 am | |
| | longer but faster sa akin... try to break ur dexterity barriers LOL hehehe pramis ung 2-gen zperm ko dati 4.xx ngaun 2.1 nlng kaso ayaw prin mag sub2 heheh kea yan hehhee |
|
 | |
papplazy 4x4x4


   Age : 16 Joined : 26 Dec 2007 Posts : 420
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 11:38 am | |
| Yeah. I have to agree with Jemay. Longer but easier to execute. Optimized algorithms tend to have awkward re-grips and move sequences. Such as sudden B's or D' that come out of nowhere. Very time consuming in my opinion. Comfort and convenience over number of moves. That's how I look at it. Yeah... _________________ Pappu de Leon |
|
 | |
C0RNICZ 3x3x3


   Age : 19 Joined : 10 Mar 2008 Posts : 97
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 12:43 pm | |
| LoNgEr.. Un Lng... _________________
|
|
 | |
iruel117 3x3x3


   Age : 14 Joined : 10 Dec 2007 Posts : 165 Location : Pasay city
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 4:33 pm | |
| longer ako pero mas gus2 ko short sa mga mahirap na cases like f-perm or e-perm isama ko na ang v-perm _________________ 3x3x3 PB SS:9.54 3x3x3 PB ave:15.68 sub-20 ako sa mga di nakakalam malalaman niyo na AKO SI IRUEL. note:first name ko ay Iruel
| Spoiler: | | | Quitter ako!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
 | |
Jome 4x4x4


   Age : 20 Joined : 25 Nov 2007 Posts : 401 Location : Malate, Manila
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 5:10 pm | |
| Shorter. Pero kung R-hand dominant 2-gen (Nakaji Z-perm, for one), I'll go for that.
Pero to put it in a better comparison, I must say that most shorter algs, though having weird moves out of nowhere, are usually faster than other "easier" agorithms.
Example: Yung mirror OLL ng FURU'R'F, it's usually done F'L'U'LUF, but I do it, (y' R'U' y') (R'URU') B. Mukhang weird, pero sa unang OLL, since left hand, umaabot ako ng 2s. Sa second one, sub-1.5.
Second case, yung mismong FURU'R'F' na algo, I do it sometimes as y2 f(RUR'U')f' if it ends up in the opposite angle. It seems weird, but it eliminates that awkward delay between the first F and U move.
Maraming scenarios, and it always depends on the case. Well, at least for me. _________________ 3x3x3 SS: 12.79s, 12.12 (PLL skip) 3x3x3 PB ave.: of 10, 18.37s; of 5, 17.62s Official WCA Record
Will kill spammers for free. No, my pic is not edited. I've got red eyes! Beware, spammers! |
|
 | |
pajodaep 5x5x5

   Age : 23 Joined : 16 Jul 2007 Posts : 738
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Thu May 08, 2008 10:38 pm | |
| i think depende din sa cuber yan. either way, may advantage at disadvantage. _________________ People say "learn F2L completely intuitively." It means you don't learn any algs. I have always been against this approach for one reason: move count. Improving F2L has a lot to do with reducing move count, and I have found that people who learn F2L intuitively often waste a lot of moves. For this reason, I recommend learning F2L by learning a list of algorithms. By the time you get to the end of the algs, you should be able to understand how they work anyway. - JASON BAUM, sub-12 |
|
 | |
MetaboringJohnCañares 5x5x5


   Age : 22 Joined : 24 Jun 2007 Posts : 627 Location : Cebu City
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Mon May 12, 2008 2:10 am | |
| It depends on your fingertricks which you are comfortable of. _________________ A picture or image, generally, is not one sided but a multiplex of vertical horizons compiled into one. So basically, if viewed critically, an image has multiple particulars; it is then for you to find out what roles these particulars act in compliance to make the picture work.
...and this is not just about photography.
Last edited by MetaboringJohnCañares on Mon May 12, 2008 5:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
 | |
bonoan1027 4x4x4


   Age : 14 Joined : 21 Mar 2008 Posts : 429 Location : Katips
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Mon May 12, 2008 2:14 am | |
| tulad ng sabi ni kuya pajo, may advantages and disadvantages ang both. i would go for shorter algs for OH. longer but easier executing algs for the normal solve _________________ I BREATH. I MOVE. I SWEAT. With the world watching my hair, my clothes. I like BLACK. BLACK is confident. BLACK looks good. LOOKING GOOD means NO DANDRUFF. CONFIDENCE means NO DANDRUFF. CLEAR means NO DANDRUFF. I trust CLEAR. Dandruff never comes back.
MY NAME IS ENZO.
and yeah... mukhang stoned ako. and yung shampoo looks like a pack of cigs. ) I don't smoke though.
I'm having a BLD DNF streak again:((((( |
|
 | |
i.luv.cube 5x5x5


  Age : 20 Joined : 17 Apr 2008 Posts : 645
| Subject: Re: longer or shorter algorithms? Mon May 12, 2008 2:37 pm | |
| What if a shorter algorithm will be invented and it can be executed much faster than the longer ones, who wouldn't prefer it diba? haha... _________________ I didn't imagine that cubing could be this great...
"I love for no reason... It's because I don't ever want to lose a reason to love...." |
|
 | |
| longer or shorter algorithms? | |
|